One advantage of our algorithm is that it is not binary in nature. by Yong Kuk Kim (13955214)

Several loop patterns found in binary code. by Alba Pedro-Zapater (8600382)

<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. by Michela C. Massi (14599915)

Calibration curves for the test set of four models. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

ROC curves for the test set of four models. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

Performance metrics of the models on the training and test set. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

SHAP bar plot. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

Display of the web prediction interface. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

Sample screening flowchart. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

Descriptive statistics for variables. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

SHAP summary plot. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

Random forest model performs better than support vector machine algorithms and when it primarily uses spontaneous photopic ERG of 60-s duration in humans. by Ramsés Noguez Imm (6658637)

Spontaneous ERG-based random forest model discriminates control and disease cases in rodent models of obesity and type 1 diabetes and predicts disease evolution in the type 1 diabe... by Ramsés Noguez Imm (6658637)

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Image 1_A multimodal AI-driven framework for cardiovascular screening and risk assessment in diverse athletic populations: innovations in sports cardiology.png by Minjin Guo (22751300)

“…</p>Results and Discussion<p>Experimental evaluation across varied athlete cohorts demonstrates superior performance in risk stratification accuracy, diagnostic plausibility, and model transparency compared to traditional screening algorithms. …”

Table 1_Heavy metal biomarkers and their impact on hearing loss risk: a machine learning framework analysis.docx by Ali Nabavi (21097424)