Search alternatives:
optimisation algorithm » optimization algorithms (Expand Search), maximization algorithm (Expand Search), identification algorithm (Expand Search)
process optimisation » process optimization (Expand Search), robust optimisation (Expand Search), process simulation (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
sample process » simple process (Expand Search), same process (Expand Search), sample processing (Expand Search)
binary sample » final sample (Expand Search), binary people (Expand Search), intra sample (Expand Search)
binary ms » binary mask (Expand Search), binary _ (Expand Search), binary b (Expand Search)
optimisation algorithm » optimization algorithms (Expand Search), maximization algorithm (Expand Search), identification algorithm (Expand Search)
process optimisation » process optimization (Expand Search), robust optimisation (Expand Search), process simulation (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
sample process » simple process (Expand Search), same process (Expand Search), sample processing (Expand Search)
binary sample » final sample (Expand Search), binary people (Expand Search), intra sample (Expand Search)
binary ms » binary mask (Expand Search), binary _ (Expand Search), binary b (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Sample image for illustration.
Published 2024“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
4
Comparison analysis of computation time.
Published 2024“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
5
Process flow diagram of CBFD.
Published 2024“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
6
Precision recall curve.
Published 2024“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”
-
7
Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane.
Published 2024“…The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”