Showing 1 - 6 results of 6 for search '(( binary pairs based optimization algorithm ) OR ( primary target phase optimization algorithm ))', query time: 0.32s Refine Results
  1. 1

    <i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. by Michela C. Massi (14599915)

    Published 2023
    “…From this dataset we can compute the MI between each interaction and the outcome and <b>(D)</b> obtain a ranked list (<i>I</i><sub><i>δ</i></sub>) based on this metric. <b>(E)</b> Starting from the interaction at the top of <i>I</i><sub><i>δ</i></sub>, <i>hi</i>PRS constructs <i>I</i><sub><i>K</i></sub>, selecting <i>K</i> (where <i>K</i> is user-specified) terms through the greedy optimization of the ratio between MI (<i>relevance</i>) and a suitable measure of similarity for interactions (<i>redundancy)</i> (cf. …”
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Data_Sheet_1_Multiclass Classification Based on Combined Motor Imageries.pdf by Cecilia Lindig-León (7889777)

    Published 2020
    “…And we propose two new multilabel uses of the Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithm to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio, namely MC2CMI and MC2SMI approaches. …”
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Seed mix selection model by Bethanne Bruninga-Socolar (10923639)

    Published 2022
    “…The model thus requires three types of data presented as matrices in order to calculate the maximum number of bee species supported by a given seed mix: 1) adult phenology of each bee species, where each cell represents whether or not that bee species was observed in the data during a given time period, 2) flowering phenology of plants, where each cell represents whether or not a bee was collected from that plant species during a given time period, and 3) pairwise interactions between plant species and bee species, where each cell represents whether each plant-bee species pair was observed interacting in the data.</p> <p>  </p> <p>We applied the seed mix selection model using a binary genetic algorithm to select seed mixes (R package ‘GA’; Scrucca 2013; Scrucca 2017). …”
  6. 6

    An Ecological Benchmark of Photo Editing Software: A Comparative Analysis of Local vs. Cloud Workflows by Pierre-Alexis DELAROCHE (22092572)

    Published 2025
    “…Experimental Methodology Framework Local Processing Pipeline Architecture Data Flow: Storage I/O → Memory Buffer → CPU/GPU Processing → Cache Coherency → Storage I/O ├── Input Vector: mmap() system call for zero-copy file access ├── Processing Engine: OpenMP parallelization with NUMA-aware thread affinity ├── Memory Management: Custom allocator with hugepage backing └── Output Vector: Direct I/O bypassing kernel page cache Cloud Processing Pipeline Architecture Data Flow: Local Storage → Network Stack → TLS Tunnel → CDN Edge → Origin Server → Processing Grid → Response Pipeline ├── Upload Phase: TCP window scaling with congestion control algorithms ├── Network Layer: Application-layer protocol with adaptive bitrate streaming ├── Server-side Processing: Containerized microservices on Kubernetes orchestration ├── Load Balancing: Consistent hashing with geographic affinity routing └── Download Phase: HTTP/2 multiplexing with server push optimization Dataset Schema and Semantic Structure Primary Data Vectors Field Data Type Semantic Meaning Measurement Unit test_type Categorical Processing paradigm identifier {local_processing, cloud_processing} photo_count Integer Cardinality of input asset vector Count avg_file_size_mb Float64 Mean per-asset storage footprint Mebibytes (2^20 bytes) total_volume_gb Float64 Aggregate data corpus size Gigabytes (10^9 bytes) processing_time_sec Integer Wall-clock execution duration Seconds (SI base unit) cpu_usage_watts Float64 Thermal design power consumption Watts (Joules/second) ram_usage_mb Integer Peak resident set size Mebibytes network_upload_mb Float64 Egress bandwidth utilization Mebibytes energy_consumption_kwh Float64 Cumulative energy expenditure Kilowatt-hours co2_equivalent_g Float64 Carbon footprint estimation Grams CO₂e test_date ISO8601 Temporal execution marker RFC 3339 format hardware_config String Node topology identifier Alphanumeric encoding Statistical Distribution Characteristics The dataset exhibits non-parametric distribution patterns with significant heteroscedasticity across computational load vectors. …”