Search alternatives:
structure optimization » structural optimization (Expand Search), structure determination (Expand Search)
path structure » data structure (Expand Search), graph structure (Expand Search), age structure (Expand Search)
binary path » binary data (Expand Search), binary health (Expand Search), binary pairs (Expand Search)
binary task » binary mask (Expand Search)
structure optimization » structural optimization (Expand Search), structure determination (Expand Search)
path structure » data structure (Expand Search), graph structure (Expand Search), age structure (Expand Search)
binary path » binary data (Expand Search), binary health (Expand Search), binary pairs (Expand Search)
binary task » binary mask (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
CDF of task latency, approximated as the inverse of the achieved computation rate.
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
-
14
The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
15
IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
16
IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
17
Comparisons of computation rate performance for different offloading algorithms.for N = 10, 20, 30.
Published 2025Subjects: -
18
Comparison of total time consumed for different offloading algorithms.for N = 10, 20, 30.
Published 2025Subjects: -
19
-
20