Search alternatives:
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
binary space » binary image (Expand Search), banach space (Expand Search)
space based » surface based (Expand Search)
binary pre » binary pairs (Expand Search)
pre design » probe design (Expand Search), core design (Expand Search), art design (Expand Search)
design optimization » bayesian optimization (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
binary space » binary image (Expand Search), banach space (Expand Search)
space based » surface based (Expand Search)
binary pre » binary pairs (Expand Search)
pre design » probe design (Expand Search), core design (Expand Search), art design (Expand Search)
-
21
Comparison of differences in literature methods.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
22
Schematic of iteration process of IDE-IIGA.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
23
Schematic diagram of IGA chromosome coding.
Published 2025“…In the experiments, optimization metrics such as kinematic optimization rate (calculated based on the shortest path and connectivity between functional areas), space utilization rate (calculated by the ratio of room area to total usable space), and functional fitness (based on the weighted sum of users’ subjective evaluations and functional matches) all perform well. …”
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40