Search alternatives:
processing optimization » process optimization (Expand Search), process optimisation (Expand Search), routing optimization (Expand Search)
model optimization » codon optimization (Expand Search), global optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search)
pre processing » _ processing (Expand Search), rna processing (Expand Search), image processing (Expand Search)
binary pre » binary pairs (Expand Search)
less based » lens based (Expand Search), lemos based (Expand Search), degs based (Expand Search)
processing optimization » process optimization (Expand Search), process optimisation (Expand Search), routing optimization (Expand Search)
model optimization » codon optimization (Expand Search), global optimization (Expand Search), based optimization (Expand Search)
pre processing » _ processing (Expand Search), rna processing (Expand Search), image processing (Expand Search)
binary pre » binary pairs (Expand Search)
less based » lens based (Expand Search), lemos based (Expand Search), degs based (Expand Search)
-
81
Illustration of two joints dynamical model of the human body in standing position.
Published 2023Subjects: -
82
The loss curve for model training.
Published 2023“…The pointer network with an encoder and decoder structure is taken as the basic network for the deep reinforcement learning algorithm. A model-free reinforcement learning algorithm is designed to train network parameters to optimize the packing sequence. …”
-
83
-
84
Cuff-less Blood Pressure Measurement based on Four-wavelength PPG Signals
Published 2023“…<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/8/4/101" target="_blank"><b>Link</b></a></p><p dir="ltr">[12] Xuhao Dong Ziyi Wang, Liangli Cao, Zhencheng Chen*, <b>Yongbo Liang*</b>. Whale Optimization Algorithm with a Hybrid Relation Vector Machine: A Highly Robust Respiratory Rate Prediction Model Using Photoplethysmography Signals [J]. …”
-
85
Iteration diagram of genetic algorithm.
Published 2023“…The results show that: (1) The applied SMOTEENN is more effective than SMOTE and ADASYN in dealing with the imbalance of banking data. (2) The F1 and AUC values of the model improved and optimized by XGBoost using genetic algorithm can reach 90% and 99%, respectively, which are optimal compared to other six machine learning models. …”
-
86
Genetic algorithm flow chart.
Published 2023“…The results show that: (1) The applied SMOTEENN is more effective than SMOTE and ADASYN in dealing with the imbalance of banking data. (2) The F1 and AUC values of the model improved and optimized by XGBoost using genetic algorithm can reach 90% and 99%, respectively, which are optimal compared to other six machine learning models. …”
-
87
-
88
KNN algorithm flowchart.
Published 2024“…In order to improve the efficiency and accuracy of high-dimensional data processing, a feature selection method based on optimized genetic algorithm is proposed in this study. …”
-
89
MGA algorithm flowchart.
Published 2024“…In order to improve the efficiency and accuracy of high-dimensional data processing, a feature selection method based on optimized genetic algorithm is proposed in this study. …”
-
90
LSTM model validation results.
Published 2025“…The outcome indicates that the standard error of the LSTM algorithm model training is less than 0.18, and the decision coefficients were all greater than 0.9. …”
-
91
Visualization of Residuals across different models applied in our research.
Published 2025Subjects: -
92
Results of genetic algorithm tuning parameters.
Published 2023“…The results show that: (1) The applied SMOTEENN is more effective than SMOTE and ADASYN in dealing with the imbalance of banking data. (2) The F1 and AUC values of the model improved and optimized by XGBoost using genetic algorithm can reach 90% and 99%, respectively, which are optimal compared to other six machine learning models. …”
-
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
Structure diagram of LSTM cell model.
Published 2025“…The outcome indicates that the standard error of the LSTM algorithm model training is less than 0.18, and the decision coefficients were all greater than 0.9. …”
-
98
Intelligent risk assessment model diagram.
Published 2025“…The outcome indicates that the standard error of the LSTM algorithm model training is less than 0.18, and the decision coefficients were all greater than 0.9. …”
-
99
LSTM model training accuracy verification.
Published 2025“…The outcome indicates that the standard error of the LSTM algorithm model training is less than 0.18, and the decision coefficients were all greater than 0.9. …”
-
100
LSTM model training stability verification.
Published 2025“…The outcome indicates that the standard error of the LSTM algorithm model training is less than 0.18, and the decision coefficients were all greater than 0.9. …”