Overview of the segmentation algorithm. by Michael C. Robitaille (11949174)

<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. by Michela C. Massi (14599915)

Calibration curves for the test set of four models. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

ROC curves for the test set of four models. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

Performance metrics of the models on the training and test set. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

SHAP bar plot. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

Display of the web prediction interface. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

Sample screening flowchart. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

Descriptive statistics for variables. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

SHAP summary plot. by Meng Cao (105914)

Subjects:

Random forest model performs better than support vector machine algorithms and when it primarily uses spontaneous photopic ERG of 60-s duration in humans. by Ramsés Noguez Imm (6658637)

A new fast filtering algorithm for a 3D point cloud based on RGB-D information by Chaochuan Jia (7256237)

“…Then, the optimal segmentation threshold of the V image that is calculated by using the Otsu algorithm is applied to segment the color mapping image into a binary image, which is used to extract the valid point cloud from the original point cloud with outliers. …”

Spontaneous ERG-based random forest model discriminates control and disease cases in rodent models of obesity and type 1 diabetes and predicts disease evolution in the type 1 diabe... by Ramsés Noguez Imm (6658637)

Symmetry test result. by Jiyong Moon (16819302)

Flowchart scheme of the ML-based model. by Noshaba Qasmi (20405009)

Image 1_A multimodal AI-driven framework for cardiovascular screening and risk assessment in diverse athletic populations: innovations in sports cardiology.png by Minjin Guo (22751300)

“…</p>Results and Discussion<p>Experimental evaluation across varied athlete cohorts demonstrates superior performance in risk stratification accuracy, diagnostic plausibility, and model transparency compared to traditional screening algorithms. …”

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…The results demonstrate that CBFD achieves a average precision of 0.97 for the test image, outperforming Superpoint, Directional Intensified Tertiary Filtering (DITF), Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features (BRIEF), Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK), Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF), and Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which achieve scores of 0.95, 0.92, 0.72, 0.66, 0.63 and 0.50 respectively. …”