Illustration of the transformed binary images of normal, benign, and malignant samples into grayscale. by Tehnan I. A. Mohamed (16846175)

RMSE on the test data when fitting (logistic) quadratic models to binary data across increasing measurement error values . by Jakub Stoklosa (3315042)

Image processing workflow. by Denis Tamiev (7404980)

“…<p>Raw fluorescent microscope images (a) were processed with a binary segmentation algorithm, and clusters of bacterial cells were manually annotated. …”

The illustration depicts our CQ-CNN architecture for binary image classification. by Mominul Islam (3513758)

Validation of image processing steps and metric results using images of a microfluidic device. by Gavrielle R. Untracht (11820311)

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Natural language processing for automated quantification of bone metastases reported in free-text bone scintigraphy reports by Olivier Q. Groot (9370461)

“…The aim of this study was to develop a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm for binary classification (single metastasis versus two or more metastases) in bone scintigraphy reports of patients undergoing surgery for bone metastases.…”

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Data_Sheet_1_Multiclass Classification Based on Combined Motor Imageries.pdf by Cecilia Lindig-León (7889777)

“…And we propose two new multilabel uses of the Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithm to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio, namely MC2CMI and MC2SMI approaches. …”

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Process flow diagram of CBFD. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Precision recall curve. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Fortran & C++: design fractal-type optical diffractive element by I-Lin Ho (13768960)

“…</p> <p>(2) calculate diffraction fields for fractal and/or grid-matrix (binary) phase-holograms.</p> <p>(3) optimize the fractal and/or grid-matrix holograms for given target diffraction images, using annealing algorithms. …”

Table_1_bSRWPSO-FKNN: A boosted PSO with fuzzy K-nearest neighbor classifier for predicting atopic dermatitis disease.docx by Yupeng Li (507508)

“…In bSRWPSO-FKNN, the core of which is to optimize the classification performance of FKNN through binary SRWPSO.…”

Fig 12 - by Nisha Yadav (366131)

Thesis-RAMIS-Figs_Slides by Felipe Santibañez-Leal (10967991)

“…<br><br>Finally, although the developed concepts, ideas and algorithms have been developed for inverse problems in geostatistics, the results are applicable to a wide range of disciplines where similar sampling problems need to be faced, included but not limited to design of communication networks, optimal integration and communication of swarms of robots and drones, remote sensing.…”

PathOlOgics_RBCs Python Scripts.zip by Ahmed Elsafty (16943883)

“…This process generated a ground-truth binary semantic segmentation mask and determined the bounding box coordinates (XYWH) for each cell. …”