Feature selection convergence time comparison of various binary metaheuristic algorithms. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

Sensitivity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Specificity values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Fitness values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Number of features selected for IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Classification accuracy values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

F-score values of IRBMO vs. other binary algorithms. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

Results of Holm’s step-down procedure. by Nebojsa Bacanin (13932723)

One advantage of our algorithm is that it is not binary in nature. by Yong Kuk Kim (13955214)

Histograms of various water quality parameters, including pH, Hardness, Solids, Chloramines, Sulfate, Organic Carbon, Trihalomethanes, Turbidity, and a binary portability check. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”

<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. by Michela C. Massi (14599915)

IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”

IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot. by Chenyi Zhu (9383370)

“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”

Classification performance after optimization. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

“…The proposed approach integrates binary feature selection and metaheuristic optimization into a unified optimization process, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation to handle complex, high-dimensional datasets. …”

ANOVA test for optimization results. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

“…The proposed approach integrates binary feature selection and metaheuristic optimization into a unified optimization process, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation to handle complex, high-dimensional datasets. …”

Wilcoxon test results for optimization. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

“…The proposed approach integrates binary feature selection and metaheuristic optimization into a unified optimization process, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation to handle complex, high-dimensional datasets. …”

Wilcoxon test results for feature selection. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

“…The proposed approach integrates binary feature selection and metaheuristic optimization into a unified optimization process, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation to handle complex, high-dimensional datasets. …”

Feature selection metrics and their definitions. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

“…The proposed approach integrates binary feature selection and metaheuristic optimization into a unified optimization process, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation to handle complex, high-dimensional datasets. …”

Statistical summary of all models. by Amal H. Alharbi (21755906)

“…The proposed approach integrates binary feature selection and metaheuristic optimization into a unified optimization process, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation to handle complex, high-dimensional datasets. …”