Illustration of the transformed binary images of normal, benign, and malignant samples into grayscale. by Tehnan I. A. Mohamed (16846175)

Top-performing model configuration and performance by algorithm type. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow. by Michela C. Massi (14599915)

Flow diagram of the proposed model. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The comparison of the accuracy score of the benchmark and the proposed models. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The prediction accuracy of simple versus hybrid models. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The accuracy score change matrix following model development. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Comparison of baseline and hybrid machine learning models in predicting IVF outcomes (%). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Confusion matrix of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Calibration curve of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

ROC and PR–AUC curves of the ABC–LR–RF hybrid model for IVF outcome prediction. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The statistical description of the original data set of the patients (<i>n</i> = 162). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The most effective active substances for subfertility treatment. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

The list of parameters of the modified data set for machine learning (<i>n</i> = 162). by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Flow diagram of the conversion of drugs into active substances. by Uğur Ejder (22683228)

Subjects:

Sample image for illustration. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Thesis-RAMIS-Figs_Slides by Felipe Santibañez-Leal (10967991)

“…Importantly, this strategy locates samples adaptively on the transition between facies which improves the performance of conventional \emph{<i>MPS</i>} algorithms. In conclusion, this work shows that preferential sampling can contribute in \emph{<i>MPS</i>} even at very small sampling regimes and, as a corollary, demonstrates that prior models (obtained form a training image) can be used effectively not only to simulate non-sensed variables of the field, but to decide where to measure next.…”

DataSheet_1_Raman Spectroscopic Differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae From Other Streptococci Using Laboratory Strains and Clinical Isolates.pdf by Marcel Dahms (9160118)

“…Improvement of the classification rate is expected with optimized model parameters and algorithms as well as with a larger spectral data base for training.…”

Quadratic polynomial in 2D image plane. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”

Comparison analysis of computation time. by Indhumathi S. (19173013)

“…Furthermore, the matching score for the test image is 0.975. The computation time for CBFD is 2.8 ms, which is at least 6.7% lower than that of other algorithms. …”