Search alternatives:
while optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search), phase optimization (Expand Search)
codon optimization » wolf optimization (Expand Search)
binary steps » final steps (Expand Search)
steps while » items while (Expand Search)
binary a » binary _ (Expand Search), binary b (Expand Search), hilary a (Expand Search)
a codon » _ codon (Expand Search), a common (Expand Search)
while optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search), wolf optimization (Expand Search), phase optimization (Expand Search)
codon optimization » wolf optimization (Expand Search)
binary steps » final steps (Expand Search)
steps while » items while (Expand Search)
binary a » binary _ (Expand Search), binary b (Expand Search), hilary a (Expand Search)
a codon » _ codon (Expand Search), a common (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Identification and quantitation of clinically relevant microbes in patient samples: Comparison of three k-mer based classifiers for speed, accuracy, and sensitivity
Published 2019“…We tested the accuracy, sensitivity, and resource requirements of three top metagenomic taxonomic classifiers that use fast k-mer based algorithms: Centrifuge, CLARK, and KrakenUniq. Binary mixtures of bacteria showed all three reliably identified organisms down to 1% relative abundance, while only the relative abundance estimates of Centrifuge and CLARK were accurate. …”
-
3
GSE96058 information.
Published 2024“…Subsequently, feature selection was conducted using ANOVA and binary Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). During the analysis phase, the discriminative power of the selected features was evaluated using machine learning classification algorithms. …”
-
4
The performance of classifiers.
Published 2024“…Subsequently, feature selection was conducted using ANOVA and binary Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). During the analysis phase, the discriminative power of the selected features was evaluated using machine learning classification algorithms. …”
-
5
Image1_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.TIF
Published 2021“…Its current hardware implementation relies on D-Wave’s Quantum Processing Units, which are limited in terms of number of qubits and architecture while being restricted to solving quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems. …”
-
6
Image3_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.TIF
Published 2021“…Its current hardware implementation relies on D-Wave’s Quantum Processing Units, which are limited in terms of number of qubits and architecture while being restricted to solving quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems. …”
-
7
Image2_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.TIF
Published 2021“…Its current hardware implementation relies on D-Wave’s Quantum Processing Units, which are limited in terms of number of qubits and architecture while being restricted to solving quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems. …”
-
8
DataSheet1_Applying the Hubbard-Stratonovich Transformation to Solve Scheduling Problems Under Inequality Constraints With Quantum Annealing.pdf
Published 2021“…Its current hardware implementation relies on D-Wave’s Quantum Processing Units, which are limited in terms of number of qubits and architecture while being restricted to solving quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems. …”