Search alternatives:
processing optimization » process optimization (Expand Search), process optimisation (Expand Search), routing optimization (Expand Search)
sample processing » image processing (Expand Search), waste processing (Expand Search), pre processing (Expand Search)
binary sample » final sample (Expand Search), binary people (Expand Search), intra sample (Expand Search)
binary task » binary mask (Expand Search)
processing optimization » process optimization (Expand Search), process optimisation (Expand Search), routing optimization (Expand Search)
sample processing » image processing (Expand Search), waste processing (Expand Search), pre processing (Expand Search)
binary sample » final sample (Expand Search), binary people (Expand Search), intra sample (Expand Search)
binary task » binary mask (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
CDF of task latency, approximated as the inverse of the achieved computation rate.
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
-
15
-
16
The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
17
IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
18
IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot.
Published 2025“…To adapt to the feature selection problem, we convert the continuous optimization algorithm to binary form via transfer function, which further enhances the applicability of the algorithm. …”
-
19
Comparisons of computation rate performance for different offloading algorithms.for N = 10, 20, 30.
Published 2025Subjects: -
20
Comparison of total time consumed for different offloading algorithms.for N = 10, 20, 30.
Published 2025Subjects: