Search alternatives:
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
yet optimization » art optimization (Expand Search), lead optimization (Expand Search), path optimization (Expand Search)
binary based » library based (Expand Search), linac based (Expand Search), binary mask (Expand Search)
binary task » binary mask (Expand Search)
task based » risk based (Expand Search)
based yet » based cft (Expand Search)
based optimization » whale optimization (Expand Search)
yet optimization » art optimization (Expand Search), lead optimization (Expand Search), path optimization (Expand Search)
binary based » library based (Expand Search), linac based (Expand Search), binary mask (Expand Search)
binary task » binary mask (Expand Search)
task based » risk based (Expand Search)
based yet » based cft (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Proposed Algorithm.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
3
Comparisons between ADAM and NADAM optimizers.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
4
The Pseudo-Code of the IRBMO Algorithm.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
5
IRBMO vs. meta-heuristic algorithms boxplot.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
6
IRBMO vs. feature selection algorithm boxplot.
Published 2025“…In order to comprehensively verify the performance of IRBMO, this paper designs a series of experiments to compare it with nine mainstream binary optimization algorithms. The experiments are based on 12 medical datasets, and the results show that IRBMO achieves optimal overall performance in key metrics such as fitness value, classification accuracy and specificity. …”
-
7
-
8
An Example of a WPT-MEC Network.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
9
Related Work Summary.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
10
Simulation parameters.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
11
Training losses for N = 10.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
12
Normalized computation rate for N = 10.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
13
Summary of Notations Used in this paper.
Published 2025“…Hence, an Energy-Harvesting Reinforcement Learning-based Offloading Decision Algorithm (EHRL) is proposed. …”
-
14
-
15
<i>hi</i>PRS algorithm process flow.
Published 2023“…From this dataset we can compute the MI between each interaction and the outcome and <b>(D)</b> obtain a ranked list (<i>I</i><sub><i>δ</i></sub>) based on this metric. <b>(E)</b> Starting from the interaction at the top of <i>I</i><sub><i>δ</i></sub>, <i>hi</i>PRS constructs <i>I</i><sub><i>K</i></sub>, selecting <i>K</i> (where <i>K</i> is user-specified) terms through the greedy optimization of the ratio between MI (<i>relevance</i>) and a suitable measure of similarity for interactions (<i>redundancy)</i> (cf. …”
-
16
SHAP bar plot.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
17
Sample screening flowchart.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
18
Descriptive statistics for variables.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
19
SHAP summary plot.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”
-
20
ROC curves for the test set of four models.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Logistic regression analysis identified age, hemoglobin concentration, education level, and social participation as significant factors influencing CI. Models based on NNET, RF, LR, and SVM algorithms were developed, achieving AUC of 0.918, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.760, respectively, on the test set. …”