Search alternatives:
area decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a greater » _ greater (Expand Search), far greater (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
area decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a greater » _ greater (Expand Search), far greater (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
-
1
Modulation for the non-preferred arm does not increase with greater arm preference.
Published 2021“…The slope was not significantly greater than 0 in any condition, meaning that increased arm preference is associated uniquely with greater modulation in the preferred arm, as opposed to an increase for both arms that is just larger for the preferred arm.…”
-
2
Data_Sheet_1_Irritability Is Associated With Decreased Cortical Surface Area and Anxiety With Decreased Gyrification During Brain Development.pdf
Published 2021“…</p><p>Results: We found that in 658 young people (with a mean age of 11.6) the parental report of irritability is associated with decreased surface area in the bilateral rostral prefrontal cortex and the precuneus. …”
-
3
-
4
Visual inputs decrease brain activity in frontal areas during silent lipreading - Fig 2
Published 2019Subjects: -
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Associations of risk of lead exposure and area deprivation index with subcortical volume.
Published 2021Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Analyses excluding participants with BMI 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> or greater from healthy volunteer groups.
Published 2024“…Similarly to the original analyses in the full data set (<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002936#pbio.3002936.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1F</a>), there was a significant post-conditioning increase in preference among participants with low preference at baseline (t<sub>(23)</sub> = 2.7; <i>P</i> = 0.01; <i>n</i> = 24) but not in those with higher baseline preference (t<sub>(19)</sub> = 0.05; <i>P</i> = 0.96; <i>n</i> = 20). …”
-
19
-
20