Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
-
361
-
362
-
363
-
364
-
365
-
366
-
367
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. The Manhattan plots show the -log10(P) values of all ~ 1,5 million SNPs against their position. …”
-
368
-
369
Morphology, Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structure of Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and Surfactant Formulation
Published 2025“…Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. …”
-
370
Morphology, Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structure of Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and Surfactant Formulation
Published 2025“…Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. …”
-
371
Morphology, Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structure of Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and Surfactant Formulation
Published 2025“…Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. …”
-
372
Morphology, Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structure of Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and Surfactant Formulation
Published 2025“…Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. …”
-
373
Morphology, Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structure of Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and Surfactant Formulation
Published 2025“…Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. …”
-
374
Morphology, Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structure of Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and Surfactant Formulation
Published 2025“…Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. …”
-
375
Morphology, Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structure of Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and Surfactant Formulation
Published 2025“…Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. …”
-
376
Morphology, Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structure of Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and Surfactant Formulation
Published 2025“…Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. …”
-
377
Morphology, Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structure of Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and Surfactant Formulation
Published 2025“…Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. …”
-
378
-
379
-
380
Data from: Large subsurface carbon stocks in a long-term no-tillage site are vulnerable to potential mineralization
Published 2024“…</p> <p>Results showed that SOC concentrations declined with depth, but the fraction that was mineralized in 350-day laboratory incubations increased with depth. We found 51% larger stocks of readily mineralized SOC stocks for the 30-153 cm depth (18.3 ± 4 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup>) compared to 0-30 cm (12.1 ± 1.6 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup>), when summing the kinetic pools that had transit times of up to 2 years. …”