Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
can decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search)
_ larger » _ large (Expand Search), _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
can decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search)
_ larger » _ large (Expand Search), _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
-
1
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…(C) Mutualism also promotes an increase in network connectance when introduced into assembled communities, while stopping mutualistic interactions from entering an assembled system slowly decreases it. …”
-
2
-
3
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…<p>(a) Left: noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PPys cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 285 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Antibody and antigen responses to nMAb vs placebo day 1–90 for Amubarvimab/ Romlusevimab.
Published 2025Subjects: -
18
-
19
Antibody and antigen responses to nMAb vs placebo day 1–90 for Tixagevimab/ Cilgavimab.
Published 2025Subjects: -
20
Antibody and antigen responses to nMAb vs placebo day 1–90 for Bamlanivimab.
Published 2025Subjects: