Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
_ larger » _ large (Expand Search), _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
_ larger » _ large (Expand Search), _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
-
1
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…Parameter values: interaction strengths were drawn from a half-normal distribution of zero mean and a standard deviation of 0.2, and strength for consumers was made no larger than the strength for resources. …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Baseline patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…Participants were randomly assigned to receive an infusion of either s-ketamine (0.3 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>), midazolam (0.05 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>), or saline in a blinded fashion. Mean respiratory rate, variability of respiratory rate (VRR), and variability of tidal volume (VTV) were measured continuously and non-invasively with a bio-impedance method. …”
-
7
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…Mean outpatient visits in the recurrence group decreased from 13.6 ± 3.0 to 11.9 ± 5.0, 8.1 ± 3.9, and 7.8 ± 3.2 at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001). …”
-
17
Annual number of outpatient visits in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, mean outpatient visits (± standard deviation) decreased from 13.6 ± 3.0 to 11.9 ± 5.0, 8.1 ± 3.9, and 7.8 ± 3.2 at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
18
-
19
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…These values significantly decreased in the first postoperative year to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0, and 3.1 ± 2.8; in the second year to 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8; and in the third year to 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>). …”
-
20