Search alternatives:
marker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
a marker » _ marker (Expand Search), _ markers (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
marker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
a marker » _ marker (Expand Search), _ markers (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
3
-
4
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…When they stop being introduced in further assembly events (i.e. introduced species do not carry any mutualistic interactions), their proportion slowly decreases with successive invasions. (B) Even though higher proportions of mutualism promote higher richness, introducing this type of interaction into already assembled large communities promotes a sudden drop in richness, while stopping mutualism promotes a slight boost in richness increase. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
Effects of GJE extract treatment decreased expression of NF-kB p65.
Published 2025“…Data are expressed as mean ± SD, error bars indicate standard deviation, n = 6/group. a: when compared to the control group. b: when compared to the NF group, <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.05 for both a and b.…”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Baseline patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…Participants were randomly assigned to receive an infusion of either s-ketamine (0.3 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>), midazolam (0.05 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>), or saline in a blinded fashion. Mean respiratory rate, variability of respiratory rate (VRR), and variability of tidal volume (VTV) were measured continuously and non-invasively with a bio-impedance method. …”
-
16
-
17
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
18
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
19
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
20
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”