Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a marked » _ marked (Expand Search), a marker (Expand Search), a market (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a marked » _ marked (Expand Search), a marker (Expand Search), a market (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Global Land Use Change Impacts on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Environmental Losses
Published 2025“…However, how global land use changes impact soil N supply and potential N loss remains elusive. By compiling a global data set of 1,782 paired observations from 185 publications, we show that land use conversion from natural to managed ecosystems significantly reduced NNM by 7.5% (−11.5, −2.8%) and increased NN by 150% (86, 194%), indicating decreasing N availability while increasing potential N loss through denitrification and nitrate leaching. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
ROC analysis to mark selectivity results in mostly mixed-selective units.
Published 2025“…The large number of mixed selective units also results in a significant decrease in accuracy when these neurons are targeted as compared to <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013559#pcbi.1013559.g006" target="_blank">Fig 6c</a> where there was no significant effect visible after targeting mixed selective units, likely because there were less mixed selective units present. …”
-
19
-
20