Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
set sizes » set size (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
set sizes » set size (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
-
1
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…When they stop being introduced in further assembly events (i.e. introduced species do not carry any mutualistic interactions), their proportion slowly decreases with successive invasions. (B) Even though higher proportions of mutualism promote higher richness, introducing this type of interaction into already assembled large communities promotes a sudden drop in richness, while stopping mutualism promotes a slight boost in richness increase. …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Female regression coefficients for regression #3 across development in set size = 2 and set size = 4.
Published 2024“…All statistics are done identically and are reported in the text. There was a slight decrease in the regression coefficient weight of intercept for set size = 2 (A), but not set size = 4 (F). …”
-
7
Effect of session on winning model parameters for set size = 2 and set size = 4 for both male and females.
Published 2024“…<p>To test if mice adjusted one-back strategies with experience, we next compared how parameter weights (y-axis) changed across the 6 sessions analyzed for each mouse (x-axis). Since set size = 2 and set size = 4 days were interspersed, we combined set size data and analyzed sessions chronologically. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Strategy parameters across development for female mice in set size = 2 and set size = 4 from winning computational model.
Published 2024“…However, female mice had a significant decrease in parameter S1 “Inappropriate Lose-Shift” in set size = 4 (H: <i>p</i> = 0.04) with a trend in a similar direction in set size = 2 (C: <i>p</i> = 0.08).…”
-
12
Strategy parameters across development for male mice in set size = 2 and set size = 4 from winning computational model.
Published 2024“…RL parameter <i>α</i><sub>+</sub> learning rate and decision noise parameter softmax <i>β</i> were stable across development in both set size = 2 (A-B) and set size = 4 (F-G). Both parameters S1 “Inappropriate Lose-Shift” and S3 “Inappropriate Lose-Stay” decreased significantly with age in set size = 2 (C: <i>p</i> = 0.02, E: <i>p</i> = 0.04), but not in set size = 4 (H,J). …”
-
13
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20