Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
peer decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a marked » _ marked (Expand Search), a marker (Expand Search), a market (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
peer decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a marked » _ marked (Expand Search), a marker (Expand Search), a market (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), b large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Elementary Steps in Olefin Metathesis: Nickelacyclobutanes via Cycloaddition to Nickel Carbenes
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Modeling the Shape and Stability of Co Nanoparticles as a Function of Size and Support Interactions through DFT Calculations and Monte Carlo Simulations
Published 2025“…We report a marked increase in step and kink sites at the expense of terraces with increasing particle size, which we linked to the experimentally observed increase in turnover frequency (TOF). …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
ROC analysis to mark selectivity results in mostly mixed-selective units.
Published 2025“…The large number of mixed selective units also results in a significant decrease in accuracy when these neurons are targeted as compared to <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013559#pcbi.1013559.g006" target="_blank">Fig 6c</a> where there was no significant effect visible after targeting mixed selective units, likely because there were less mixed selective units present. …”