Showing 1 - 20 results of 38,424 for search '(( c large decrease ) OR ( a cases increased ))', query time: 0.80s Refine Results
  1. 1

    The number of expected vaccinations decreases with the expected vaccination time, whereas the peak of infections increases. by Simon K. Schnyder (16632244)

    Published 2023
    “…Brighter colours indicate higher 〈<i>s</i>(<i>t</i><sub><i>v</i></sub>)〉. Note the nonlinear increase of <i>n</i> on the y-axis. C) Relatedly, we show the peak of infections max<sub><i>t</i></sub>(<i>i</i>(<i>t</i>)) as a heat map as function of the expected vaccination time 〈<i>t</i><sub><i>v</i></sub>〉 for the same range of vaccine arrival distributions <i>p</i><sub><i>n</i></sub> as in B). …”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    In superadditive networks, more enhancers decrease noise and fidelity. by Alvaro Fletcher (15675430)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>(A) Superadditivity is implemented in our model by linearly increasing <i>k</i><sub>on</sub> rates and linearly decreasing <i>k</i><sub>off</sub> rates. …”
  15. 15

    The time series depicts cases in which the period length remains relatively constant despite increasing reaction rates in the circadian clock model (A: reference set case, B: increased reaction rates case). by Shingo Gibo (21762920)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Additionally, synchronization regions for these cases are presented (C: reference set case, D: increased reaction rates case). …”
  16. 16

    Increase Learning Agility through Unsolvable Cases by Siti Noorbaiyah Binti Abdul Malek (9589485)

    Published 2020
    “…This study presents the use of a case study approach for teaching students in Food Law and Regulations. …”
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Increase in probability of cases (cancer) with the presence of causal-based biomarkers as a function of K. by Divyagna Bavikadi (21526214)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Increase in probability of cases (cancer) with the presence of causal-based biomarkers as a function of K.…”
  20. 20