Showing 1 - 20 results of 5,794 for search '(( calculated ((mean decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( a ((large decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.51s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity. by Ghattas Bisharat (20706928)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(a) Left: noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PPys cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 285 neurons, mean ± SE). …”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness. by Gui Araujo (22170819)

    Published 2025
    “…When they stop being introduced in further assembly events (i.e. introduced species do not carry any mutualistic interactions), their proportion slowly decreases with successive invasions. (B) Even though higher proportions of mutualism promote higher richness, introducing this type of interaction into already assembled large communities promotes a sudden drop in richness, while stopping mutualism promotes a slight boost in richness increase. …”
  6. 6
  7. 7

    Modeling the Shape and Stability of Co Nanoparticles as a Function of Size and Support Interactions through DFT Calculations and Monte Carlo Simulations by Enrico Sireci (12127349)

    Published 2025
    “…Increasing MSI led to a flattening of the NPs on the support as well as to decreasing Co dispersion but hardly affected the site distribution, suggesting that they do not alter the NPs intrinsic activity. …”
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”