Search alternatives:
selection algorithm » detection algorithms (Expand Search), prediction algorithms (Expand Search)
code detection » score detection (Expand Search), case detection (Expand Search), wide detection (Expand Search)
selection algorithm » detection algorithms (Expand Search), prediction algorithms (Expand Search)
code detection » score detection (Expand Search), case detection (Expand Search), wide detection (Expand Search)
-
421
-
422
Data Sheet 1_Developing decision support algorithm for hypertension medications for use in a digital therapeutic system.pdf
Published 2025“…Case scenarios were used to code the algorithm into the app.</p>Results<p>A total of 117 hypertension medications and combination products were included in the formulary of the Medication Education, Decision Support, Reminding, and Monitoring (MEDSReM<sup>©</sup>) system, a mobile digital therapeutic. …”
-
423
Data Sheet 2_Developing decision support algorithm for hypertension medications for use in a digital therapeutic system.pdf
Published 2025“…Case scenarios were used to code the algorithm into the app.</p>Results<p>A total of 117 hypertension medications and combination products were included in the formulary of the Medication Education, Decision Support, Reminding, and Monitoring (MEDSReM<sup>©</sup>) system, a mobile digital therapeutic. …”
-
424
Modules of the UK Biobank MHQ2.
Published 2025“…It includes established measures, such as the PHQ-9 for current depression and CIDI-SF for lifetime panic, as well as bespoke questions. Algorithms and R code were developed to facilitate analysis.…”
-
425
Data Sheet 1_Feature selection and aggregation for antibiotic resistance GWAS in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a comparative study.pdf
Published 2025“…In this study, we evaluated several such methods, namely, logistic regression with different regularization penalty functions, a recently introduced algorithm for solving the best-subset selection problem (ABESS) and “Hungry, Hungry SNPos” (HHS) a heuristic algorithm specifically developed to identify resistance-associated genetic variants in the presence of resistance co-occurrence. …”
-
426
Smart contract and interface code for Nature Energy "A general form of smart contract for decentralised energy systems management"
Published 2024“…(Nature Reference: 18050854)<br>The contents are as follows:<br>Smart contracts:<br>The HCO.sol and RPS.sol files are the smart contract files (Highest Combined Offer and Ranked Preference Selection Algorithm). Theses were compiled using the online Remix IDE (https://remix.ethereum.org accessed 26/11/2018) with the resultant bytecode and application binary interface (the .txt and .json files with relevant titles).…”
-
427
Using synthetic data to test group-searching algorithms in a context where the correct grouping of species is known and uniquely defined.
Published 2024“…The panel shows representative outputs of these algorithms for <i>N</i> = 3 metabolites and for the number of groups indicated at the top. …”
-
428
Data Sheet 1_Tumor tissue-of-origin classification using miRNA-mRNA-lncRNA interaction networks and machine learning methods.docx
Published 2025“…Ensemble ML algorithms were trained and validated with stratified five-fold cross-validation for robust performance assessment across class distributions.…”
-
429
-
430
Quantitative results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
431
Counting results on DRPD dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
432
Quantitative results on RFRB dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
433
Main module structure.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
434
Counting results on MTDC-UAV dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
435
Quantitative results on DRPD dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
436
Architecture of MAR-YOLOv9.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
437
Quantitative results on MTDC-UAV dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
438
Counting results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
439
Example images from four plant datasets.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
440
Counting results on RFRB dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”