Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
05 a » 0.5 a (Expand Search), 05 0 (Expand Search), 05 1 (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
05 a » 0.5 a (Expand Search), 05 0 (Expand Search), 05 1 (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
BrdU incorporation is elevated in clrn1-/- zebrafish at 4 mpf and decreases with age.
Published 2025“…<p>Anti-BrdU (green) staining in paraffin sections from (a,a’) 4 mpf, (b,b’) 8 mpf, (c,c’) 12 mpf, and (d,d’) 20 mpf in wild-type and <i>clrn1</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> zebrafish retinas. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Charts revealing A) the significant decrease (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the membrane integrity and B) the significant increase (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the membrane permeability after treatment with harmalacidine hydrochloride in a representative <i>S. aureus</i> isolate (n = 3 as technical repeats of the same isolate).
Published 2025“…<p>Charts revealing A) the significant decrease (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the membrane integrity and B) the significant increase (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the membrane permeability after treatment with harmalacidine hydrochloride in a representative <i>S. aureus</i> isolate (n = 3 as technical repeats of the same isolate).…”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Comparison of MAP@0.5 results from experiments.
Published 2025“…Experimental results demonstrate that SCI-YOLO11 achieves a 3.2% improvement over baseline models in terms of MAP@0.5 metric; precision and recall rates increase by 2.6% and 3.7%, respectively. …”
-
17
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…(d) Noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PV cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 31 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 49.6, <i>p</i> = 2.6 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 1.94, <i>p</i> = 0.02, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), F = 56.5, <i>p</i> = 8.8 × 10<sup>−14</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 3.5, <i>p</i> = 3.5 × 10<sup>−05</sup>). …”
-
18
-
19
-
20