Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
22 0 » 2 0 (Expand Search), 25 0 (Expand Search), 02 0 (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
22 0 » 2 0 (Expand Search), 25 0 (Expand Search), 02 0 (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Risk of bias across 22 included studie.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A meta-analysis of 22 RCTs (n = 3,463) showed that ketamine/esketamine significantly decreased PPD risk at 1- (risk ratio [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3–0.57) and 4–6-week (RR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.35–0.63) follow-ups. …”
-
16
Characteristics of studies (<i>n</i> = 22).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A meta-analysis of 22 RCTs (n = 3,463) showed that ketamine/esketamine significantly decreased PPD risk at 1- (risk ratio [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3–0.57) and 4–6-week (RR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.35–0.63) follow-ups. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20