Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
Evaluation index results for the JS-10 phantom.
Published 2025“…At ≥50 s/view, variation in the maximum and mean SUVs decreased, with the RSE remaining below 5%. …”
-
44
NEMA IEC body phantom.
Published 2025“…At ≥50 s/view, variation in the maximum and mean SUVs decreased, with the RSE remaining below 5%. …”
-
45
Relationship between contrast, noise, and CNR.
Published 2025“…At ≥50 s/view, variation in the maximum and mean SUVs decreased, with the RSE remaining below 5%. …”
-
46
JS-10 phantom.
Published 2025“…At ≥50 s/view, variation in the maximum and mean SUVs decreased, with the RSE remaining below 5%. …”
-
47
The raw data used for the analyses in this study.
Published 2025“…At ≥50 s/view, variation in the maximum and mean SUVs decreased, with the RSE remaining below 5%. …”
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
The results of linear mixed model.
Published 2024“…The tDCS group demonstrated a significant decrease in AMT of MF and TrA/IO muscles (P < 0.05) and an increase in N80 amplitude (P = 0.027), with no significant changes in the control group. …”
-
58
-
59
-
60