Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
c nn » c ann (Expand Search), c n (Expand Search), _ nn (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
c nn » c ann (Expand Search), c n (Expand Search), _ nn (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
4
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
5
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
6
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
7
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
8
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
9
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
10
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
11
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
12
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
13
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
14
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
15
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
16
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
17
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
18
Image 2_Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features of primary liver perivascular epithelioid cell tumor with renal angiomyolipoma: a case report and literature rev...
Published 2025“…The enhancement slightly decreased in the equilibrium phase and the delayed phase. …”
-
19
Image 1_Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features of primary liver perivascular epithelioid cell tumor with renal angiomyolipoma: a case report and literature rev...
Published 2025“…The enhancement slightly decreased in the equilibrium phase and the delayed phase. …”
-
20
Data Sheet 1_Correlation analysis of osteoporosis and vertebral endplate defects using CT and MRI imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study.pdf
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bone mineral density (BMD) and other relevant imaging data, as well as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and degree of low back pain data, were retrospectively analysed. …”