Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
n decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
n decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
KAP assessment scores (n = 422).
Published 2025“…The baseline mean knowledge level score was 9.5 (38.0%) and rose to 21.08 (84.3%) p = 0.000 immediate post-health education and a 2.1% decrease 20.54 (82.2%) p<0.001 at week six from the immediate post health education score. …”
-
4
Mammary fistula (n(%)).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
5
-
6
A flow diagram of the study entry.
Published 2025“…Cluster analysis classified 4 clusters of decline in food intake changes during the last 6 months before death: immediate decrease (n = 14); decrease from 1 month before death (n = 24); decrease from 3 months before death (n = 7); and gradual decrease for 6 months before death (n = 24).…”
-
7
Data from: Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas
Published 2025“…</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">#METADATA</p><p dir="ltr">#'data.frame': 472 obs. of 28 variables:</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ ID: Factor variable; a unique identity for the response to the survey</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Year: Factor variable; six factors available (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021) representing the year for the response to the survey</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_annual: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies annually lost</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_annual: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies annually alive</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_dry: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies lost during the dry season</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_dry: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies alive during the dry season</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_rainy: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies lost during the rainy season</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_rainy: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies alive during the rainy season</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Education: Factor variable; four factors are available ("Self-taught","Learned from another melip","Intro training","Formal tech training"), representing the training level in meliponiculture</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Operation_Size: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies managed by the participant (in n)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ propAgri: Numeric variable; representing the percentage of agricultural area surrounding the meliponary (in %)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ propForest: Numeric variable; representing the percentage of forested area surrounding the meliponary (in %)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_annual: Numeric variable; representing the average annual temperature (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_annual_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_Oct_March_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between October to March (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_Apri_Sept_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between April to September (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_Oct_March: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between October to March (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_Apri_Sept: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between April to September (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Importance_dead: Factor variable; three factors are available Normal","High","Very high"), representing the perception of the significance of annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Climatic_environmental: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered climatic and environmental problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Contamination: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered contamination problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Nutritional: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered nutritional problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Sanitary: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered sanitary problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Queen: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered queen problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Time: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered time problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Economic: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered economic problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Attacks: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered time attacks as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Swarming: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered swarming problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p><br></p>…”
-
8
-
9
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
Inhibition of NEAT1 decreased the miR-204-5p expression and increased Six1 expression.
Published 2024“…<p>(A) NEAT1 expression following siRNA transfection in BEAS-2B cells; (B-D) The expression of NEAT1, miR-204-5p, and Six1 after decreasing NEAT1 expression. * p <0.05, *** p < 0.001, and **** p <0.0001.…”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20