Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
15
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
16
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
17
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
18
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
19
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
20