Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”
-
6
-
7
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…These values significantly decreased in the first postoperative year to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0, and 3.1 ± 2.8; in the second year to 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8; and in the third year to 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>). …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Skin marks is the S1 Fig title.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The IRD decreased after both exercise programs compared to baseline measurements in AB2 (mean difference: 3.06 mm, 95% CI: 1.06 to 5.05) and in AB5 (mean difference: 2.88 mm, 95% CI: 1.59 to 4.17), confirming the long-term effect of exercise. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20