Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Contrasting Size Dependence of Photochemical Lifetimes of Polypropylene and Expanded Polystyrene Microplastics in Surface Waters
Published 2025“…Sunlight-driven photochemistry can dissolve buoyant microplastics, producing dissolved organic carbon (DOC). We hypothesized that plastic dissolution would increase linearly with increasing surface area (SA)-to-volume (V) ratio as plastics decrease in size. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Plot of percent saccade error over time.
Published 2024“…For this specific task, we found five fixation types. The “ideal” response would be a single accurate saccade after each target movement, with a typical saccade latency of 200-250 msec, followed by a long fixation (> 800 msec) until the next target jump. …”
-
13
Plot of the median saccade error over time.
Published 2024“…For this specific task, we found five fixation types. The “ideal” response would be a single accurate saccade after each target movement, with a typical saccade latency of 200-250 msec, followed by a long fixation (> 800 msec) until the next target jump. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
S1 Graphical -
Published 2025“…Administered alone, acetamiprid significantly decreased the level of urea in the hemolymph of worker honey bees. …”
-
17
Data Sheet 1_Empagliflozin’s cardioenergetic protective effects through PPARα pathway modulation in heart failure.pdf
Published 2025“…Post-treatment, MRGlu and glucose uptake decreased markedly in the empagliflozin (EMPG) group, while no significant changes were observed in the fenofibrate (FF) group. …”
-
18
Raw database.
Published 2025“…The mean score across all tests was 9.19 (standard deviation = 2.34). …”
-
19
Comparison of forward resistance.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
20
Boundary condition.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”