Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
men decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), meja decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
men decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), meja decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
9
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
10
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
11
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
12
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
13
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Outline of study participants.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>This study was implemented on 2,688 men and 3,260 women, respectively with the mean (SD) age of 41.5(14.1) and 39.3(13.02) years. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
Blood test data.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Data for eye examinations and blood tests in 41 eyes of 41 participants (23 men; mean age 49.1 ± 8.3) were analyzed. …”