Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…This study investigated clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with longitudinal decreases in LV size in this population. Methods: We analyzed echocardiographic data from 6,232 adults with normal baseline left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), with a mean interval of 4.8 years between baseline and follow-up echocardiograms. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
Study selection criteria.
Published 2025“…Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment.…”
-
7
PICOS criteria for the SLR.
Published 2025“…Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment.…”
-
8
PRISMA flow chart.
Published 2025“…Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment.…”
-
9
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
10
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
11
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
12
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
13
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
14
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20