Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…This is attributed to efficient CT observed in spectroscopic analyses and is consistent with the computed small HOMO–LUMO gap (2.92 eV) in a model of the host–guest system. <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. …”
-
4
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…This is attributed to efficient CT observed in spectroscopic analyses and is consistent with the computed small HOMO–LUMO gap (2.92 eV) in a model of the host–guest system. <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. …”
-
5
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…This is attributed to efficient CT observed in spectroscopic analyses and is consistent with the computed small HOMO–LUMO gap (2.92 eV) in a model of the host–guest system. <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. …”
-
6
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…This is attributed to efficient CT observed in spectroscopic analyses and is consistent with the computed small HOMO–LUMO gap (2.92 eV) in a model of the host–guest system. <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. …”
-
7
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…This is attributed to efficient CT observed in spectroscopic analyses and is consistent with the computed small HOMO–LUMO gap (2.92 eV) in a model of the host–guest system. <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. …”
-
8
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…This is attributed to efficient CT observed in spectroscopic analyses and is consistent with the computed small HOMO–LUMO gap (2.92 eV) in a model of the host–guest system. <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Supplementary Material for: Allopurinol Use is Associated With Decreased Incidence of Hepatic Decompensation and Overall Mortality Among Individuals With Cirrhosis: a Propensity-ma...
Published 2025“…Allopurinol exposure was associated with a decreased incidence of esophageal variceal bleeding (OR: 0.71 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.92), ascites (OR: 0.77 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.84), HE (OR: 0.76 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.92), SBP (OR: 0.61 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.80), and overall death (OR: 0.86 95%% CI: 0.77 to 0.96) compared to the control group. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20