Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
19
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
20
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”