Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
246 decrease » 026 decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
246 decrease » 026 decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Global Land Use Change Impacts on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Environmental Losses
Published 2025Subjects: -
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Naphthalen-1-yl 2,4,6-trimethyl benzenesulfonate enhances cadmium tolerance in <i>Zea mays</i> by boosting antioxidant defense and photosynthetic efficiency
Published 2025“…This study investigates whether naphthalene-1-yl 2,4,6-trimethyl benzenesulfonate (NTB) acts as a dual-functional agent by enhancing Cd uptake and reducing toxicity in maize. …”
-
7
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
8
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
9
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
10
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
11
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
12
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
13
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
14
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
15
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
16
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
17
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
18
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
19
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
20
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”