Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
_ step » _ stem (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
_ step » _ stem (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Increase in physical activity (100 step, 500 steps or 1000 steps) after the challenge according to decrease in screen time < or ≥60 minutes.
Published 2024“…<p>Increase in physical activity (100 step, 500 steps or 1000 steps) after the challenge according to decrease in screen time < or ≥60 minutes.…”
-
7
Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.
Published 2025“…<p>Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.</p>…”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
15
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20