Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…(<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>). Mean outpatient visits in the recurrence group decreased from 13.6 ± 3.0 to 11.9 ± 5.0, 8.1 ± 3.9, and 7.8 ± 3.2 at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001). …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Annual number of outpatient visits in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, mean outpatient visits (± standard deviation) decreased from 13.6 ± 3.0 to 11.9 ± 5.0, 8.1 ± 3.9, and 7.8 ± 3.2 at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
12
-
13
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…Regarding the mean number of treatments in the recurrence group, anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatment counts in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20