Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
Showing 221 - 240 results of 5,838 for search '(( ct ((values decrease) OR (largest decrease)) ) OR ( a ((mean decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ))', query time: 0.41s Refine Results
  1. 221
  2. 222

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  3. 223
  4. 224
  5. 225
  6. 226
  7. 227
  8. 228

    Flow chart. by Abed al Hadi Krisht (19704098)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Objective</p><p>The objectives of this study were to measure the prognostic value of the extent of lung parenchymal lesions on computed tomography (CT) and of several coagulation and inflammatory biomarkers, and to explore the characteristics of the patients depending on the extent of lung parenchymal lesions.…”
  9. 229

    S1 File - by Abed al Hadi Krisht (19704098)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Objective</p><p>The objectives of this study were to measure the prognostic value of the extent of lung parenchymal lesions on computed tomography (CT) and of several coagulation and inflammatory biomarkers, and to explore the characteristics of the patients depending on the extent of lung parenchymal lesions.…”
  10. 230
  11. 231
  12. 232
  13. 233

    Force analysis of a single rib. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  14. 234
  15. 235
  16. 236
  17. 237
  18. 238
  19. 239
  20. 240