Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
941
Biocompatible and Antifouling Linear Poly(<i>N</i>‑(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide)-Coated Capillaries via Aqueous RAFT Polymerization Method for Clinical Proteomics Analysis of No...
Published 2025“…In this study, a linear poly(<i>N</i>-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (LP(HPMA))-coated capillary was prepared by using the surface-confined aqueous reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization method. …”
-
942
Biocompatible and Antifouling Linear Poly(<i>N</i>‑(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide)-Coated Capillaries via Aqueous RAFT Polymerization Method for Clinical Proteomics Analysis of No...
Published 2025“…In this study, a linear poly(<i>N</i>-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (LP(HPMA))-coated capillary was prepared by using the surface-confined aqueous reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization method. …”
-
943
Biocompatible and Antifouling Linear Poly(<i>N</i>‑(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide)-Coated Capillaries via Aqueous RAFT Polymerization Method for Clinical Proteomics Analysis of No...
Published 2025“…In this study, a linear poly(<i>N</i>-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (LP(HPMA))-coated capillary was prepared by using the surface-confined aqueous reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization method. …”
-
944
Biocompatible and Antifouling Linear Poly(<i>N</i>‑(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide)-Coated Capillaries via Aqueous RAFT Polymerization Method for Clinical Proteomics Analysis of No...
Published 2025“…In this study, a linear poly(<i>N</i>-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (LP(HPMA))-coated capillary was prepared by using the surface-confined aqueous reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization method. …”
-
945
-
946
Excel data file with all collected data.
Published 2025“…SD = 11.6) after the last day of treatment. 25% (n = 5) met the response criteria, with a mean time to response of 2.2 days (min = 1, max = 3. …”
-
947
-
948
Experimental and analytical data accompanying a paper entitled "changes in the effective absolute permeability of hydrate-bearing sands during isotropic loading and unloading" [Dat...
Published 2025“…The effective absolute permeability of hydrate-bearing sands decreases with the increase of hydrate saturation and mean effective stress, and the permeability stress sensitivity is stronger with higher hydrate saturation and lower mean effective stresses. …”
-
949
-
950
-
951
-
952
-
953
-
954
A layer structure for solving the model.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Method</p><p>A Runge-Kutta solver is applied to collect the dataset, which decreases the mean square error by dividing into training as 78%, testing 12% and verification 10%. …”
-
955
A structure of single hidden layers.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Method</p><p>A Runge-Kutta solver is applied to collect the dataset, which decreases the mean square error by dividing into training as 78%, testing 12% and verification 10%. …”
-
956
-
957
Subgroup analysis of AIP and depression.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>In comparison to quartile 1, Multivariate logistic regression revealed that AIP in quartiles 2–4 yielded odd ratios (ORs) (95% confidence interval, 95% CI) of premenopausal women of 1.14 (0.87, 1.50), 1.06 (0.79, 1.42), and 1.49 (1.11, 2.00), and postmenopausal women of 0.88 (0.64, 1.22), 1.03 (0.76, 1.41) and 1.40 (1.04, 1.89), respectively. RCS showed a linear correlation between AIP and depression in premenopausal women and a nonlinear correlation between AIP and depression in postmenopausal women. …”
-
958
Flow of premises through the study.
Published 2024“…After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the intervention resulted in a mean daily change of −2,769 ml (95% CI [−4,188, −1,578] <i>p</i> < 0.001) or −9.7% (95% CI [−13.5%, −6.1%] in beer sold. …”
-
959
-
960