Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
1861
-
1862
-
1863
-
1864
-
1865
-
1866
-
1867
-
1868
-
1869
-
1870
-
1871
-
1872
-
1873
-
1874
-
1875
Description of the myofascial release techniques.
Published 2024“…</b></p><p>Results</p><p>Thirty-eight patients (14 in CRT, 14 in CRT+MRT, and 10 in RUHB), with a mean age of 55 years and 50% male, completed the study. …”
-
1876
Study flow diagram.
Published 2024“…</b></p><p>Results</p><p>Thirty-eight patients (14 in CRT, 14 in CRT+MRT, and 10 in RUHB), with a mean age of 55 years and 50% male, completed the study. …”
-
1877
Clinical characteristics of the study population.
Published 2024“…</b></p><p>Results</p><p>Thirty-eight patients (14 in CRT, 14 in CRT+MRT, and 10 in RUHB), with a mean age of 55 years and 50% male, completed the study. …”
-
1878
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
1879
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
1880