Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
-
381
-
382
-
383
-
384
-
385
Parameters used in the simulations.
Published 2025“…At the sample scale, the peak deviatoric stress increased by approximately 15–40% as aspect ratio decreased from 1.00 to 0.33 and sphericity decreased from 1.00 to 0.11. …”
-
386
Two ellipsoidal particles in contact.
Published 2025“…At the sample scale, the peak deviatoric stress increased by approximately 15–40% as aspect ratio decreased from 1.00 to 0.33 and sphericity decreased from 1.00 to 0.11. …”
-
387
Different contact patterns for two ellipsoids.
Published 2025“…At the sample scale, the peak deviatoric stress increased by approximately 15–40% as aspect ratio decreased from 1.00 to 0.33 and sphericity decreased from 1.00 to 0.11. …”
-
388
-
389
-
390
-
391
Abutment shoulder adhesive filling rate (AFR) of silicone rubber calculated by ImageJ.
Published 2025Subjects: -
392
-
393
Retention strength testing of the cemented crown by universal testing machine.
Published 2025Subjects: -
394
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
395
Data of Cement retention force(N) for each group in retention strength test.
Published 2025Subjects: -
396
-
397
-
398
-
399
Photograph of the implant prostheses with different hole opening strategies.
Published 2025Subjects: -
400