Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
men decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), meja decreased (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
men decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), meja decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Linear regression analysis.
Published 2025“…(p = 0.011), while in the RT-only treated group, it declined by 0.57% with an average of -0.41 HU.</p><p> Conclusion </p><p>The HTRT group showed a greater decrease in HU both pre- and post-treatment, indicating a possible indirect marker of tumor necrosis. …”
-
18
Patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…(p = 0.011), while in the RT-only treated group, it declined by 0.57% with an average of -0.41 HU.</p><p> Conclusion </p><p>The HTRT group showed a greater decrease in HU both pre- and post-treatment, indicating a possible indirect marker of tumor necrosis. …”
-
19
-
20