Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
-
261
-
262
-
263
-
264
-
265
Study 1_EFA.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
-
266
-
267
-
268
-
269
-
270
-
271
-
272
-
273
Raw data.
Published 2025“…The participants were divided into low and high groups for RC, and the RC-to-cholesterol ratio was based on the median values. Vertebral fractures were assessed via the Genant semiquantitative classification system on CT-reconstructed sagittal images.…”
-
274
Baseline characteristics of the subjects.
Published 2025“…The participants were divided into low and high groups for RC, and the RC-to-cholesterol ratio was based on the median values. Vertebral fractures were assessed via the Genant semiquantitative classification system on CT-reconstructed sagittal images.…”
-
275
-
276
-
277
-
278
-
279
-
280
Study 2_Experiment 1.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”