Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
8
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 49.6, <i>p</i> = 2.6 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 1.94, <i>p</i> = 0.02, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), F = 56.5, <i>p</i> = 8.8 × 10<sup>−14</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 3.5, <i>p</i> = 3.5 × 10<sup>−05</sup>). …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20