Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
19341
Image_2_Genome-Wide Patterns of Population Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium in Farmed Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).jpg
Published 2019“…No differences were observed in the LD decay among populations, with a rapid decrease of r<sup>2</sup> with increasing inter-marker distance. …”
-
19342
Rho Kinase Enhances Contractions of Rat Mesenteric Collecting Lymphatics
Published 2014“…The significant decrease in tone caused by H1152 or Y-27632 was not associated with a significant change in the basal [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]<sub>i</sub> between transients. …”
-
19343
Image_1_Genome-Wide Patterns of Population Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium in Farmed Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).jpg
Published 2019“…No differences were observed in the LD decay among populations, with a rapid decrease of r<sup>2</sup> with increasing inter-marker distance. …”
-
19344
Mechanically-sensitive afferents and presumed sympathetic efferents exhibit different twin pulse speeding and activity-dependent slowing during the repeated twin-pulse paradigm.
Published 2010“…After 20 twin pulses, speeding develops over a range of ISIs from 20 to 100 ms. (n = 7–12, except at the 1<sup>st</sup> twin pulse at 50 ms where n = 46). …”
-
19345
C1 shows similar results on macrophages as for microglia and does not interfere with cell activity, proliferation, and cell death are not affected in non-stimulated conditions.
Published 2023“…<b>d)</b> When stimulated with 1 μg/mL LPS (for 48 hours, using the same protocol as referred above C1 caused a dose independent decrease in cell activity for all 3 concentrations of C1 (0.025μM: 78.47 ± 31.61%, p = 0.0245; 0.25μM: 69.31 ± 36.50%, p = 0.001; 2.5μM: 66.48 ± 31.17%, p<0.001) in comparison to the positive control (100 ± 4.74%) and when cells were treated with 2.5 μM C1 there was a reduction of the cell activity also when compared to the DMSO control (p = 0.0310). …”
-
19346
-
19347
-
19348
-
19349
-
19350
-
19351
-
19352
-
19353
-
19354
-
19355
-
19356
-
19357
-
19358
-
19359
-
19360