Search alternatives:
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a mean » _ mean (Expand Search)
e non » _ non (Expand Search), a non (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a mean » _ mean (Expand Search)
e non » _ non (Expand Search), a non (Expand Search)
-
121
The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size.
Published 2022“…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…(d) Noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PV cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 31 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 49.6, <i>p</i> = 2.6 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 1.94, <i>p</i> = 0.02, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), F = 56.5, <i>p</i> = 8.8 × 10<sup>−14</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 3.5, <i>p</i> = 3.5 × 10<sup>−05</sup>). …”
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
-
136
-
137
-
138
-
139
Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM.
Published 2019“…Non-specific DOM binding was detected by amplifying an intergenic region (FBgn0003638) of the <i>Drosophila</i> genome and subtracted from the signal from the <i>per CRS</i> and <i>tim E-box 1</i> signals. …”
-
140