S100A4 inhibits cell proliferation by interfering with the S100A1-RAGE V domain - Fig 4 by Md. Imran Khan (4853302)

“…<p>(A) Emission of fluorescence spectra of S100A1 titrations showing a decrease in intensity with the addition of S100A4 at μM-level concentrations. …”

Rhodomyrtone dose dependently decreases production of <i>CXCL1</i>, <i>IL-36G</i>, <i>IL-36RN</i>, <i>MMP-13</i>, <i>S100A7</i>, <i>S100A8</i>, and <i>S100A12</i> transcripts by IL-17A/TNF-α-stimulated primary human keratinocytes. by Julalak Chorachoo (5855852)

S100A4 inhibits cell proliferation by interfering with the S100A1-RAGE V domain - Fig 2 by Md. Imran Khan (4853302)

“…The cross peaks, which exhibited decreased intensity, are boxed in green. (B) Ribbon diagram showing the structure of S100A1—decreasing residues are labeled on the structure in green.…”

S100A4 inhibits cell proliferation by interfering with the S100A1-RAGE V domain - Fig 1 by Md. Imran Khan (4853302)

“…(B) Ribbon diagram showing the structure of S100A4; intensity decreasing residues are labeled on the structure in cyan.…”

SHIP-1 decreases NOD2-induced NF-κB activation in monocytes/macrophages. by Claude Condé (150801)

CaMKII inhibition does not alter dendritic spine density, but decreases dendritic length and complexity. by Jason R. Klug (132807)

CFU-Mk is significantly decreased by GATA1s overexpression in <i>GATA1s</i> strains. by Shiori Matsuo (10492159)

SNX17 knockdown diminishes surface levels of ApoER2 by decreasing its recycling. by Pablo Sotelo (547402)

S100A1 interferes with the p53-MDM2 complex formation. by Deepu Dowarha (5673440)

Subjects:

The energy, the total number of proteins, fat, and carbohydrates of the diets per 100 g. by Fatima Dikhanbayeva (11501962)

Mice exposed to neonatal hyperoxia have persistent RVH and decreased vessel density at 21d. by Marta Perez (526067)

SIRT1 expression in liver tumors and the inhibition of SIRT1 decreases hepatic tumorigenesis in mice. by Kyu Yun Jang (134932)

Identification of the <i>Ndfip1</i> gene and Ndfip1 expression is decreased by spatial training. by Wei-Lun Hsu (1756123)

The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size. by Liron Sheintuch (12078310)

“…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”

Shrub Invasion Decreases Diversity and Alters Community Stability in Northern Chihuahuan Desert Plant Communities by Selene Báez (271886)

“…</p><h3>Principal Findings</h3><p>Our results indicated that <em>Larrea</em> invasion decreased species richness during the last 100 years. …”

Data_Sheet_1_Effect of decreased platelets on postoperative recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma.docx by Kenji Yagi (2990967)

“…In univariable logistic analysis, eosinophil-rich blood (≥100/μL eosinophils in peripheral blood) and a decreased PC were significant risk factors. …”

Image_4_GPER-Induced ERK Signaling Decreases Cell Viability of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.tif by Yu-an Qiu (10272836)

“…In the present study, we found a remarkable difference in GPER staining between tumor tissue (100/141, 70.9%) and matched non-tumor tissue (27/30, 90.0%). …”

Image_3_GPER-Induced ERK Signaling Decreases Cell Viability of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.tif by Yu-an Qiu (10272836)

“…In the present study, we found a remarkable difference in GPER staining between tumor tissue (100/141, 70.9%) and matched non-tumor tissue (27/30, 90.0%). …”

Image_2_GPER-Induced ERK Signaling Decreases Cell Viability of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.tif by Yu-an Qiu (10272836)

“…In the present study, we found a remarkable difference in GPER staining between tumor tissue (100/141, 70.9%) and matched non-tumor tissue (27/30, 90.0%). …”

Image_1_GPER-Induced ERK Signaling Decreases Cell Viability of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.tif by Yu-an Qiu (10272836)

“…In the present study, we found a remarkable difference in GPER staining between tumor tissue (100/141, 70.9%) and matched non-tumor tissue (27/30, 90.0%). …”