Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e non » _ non (Expand Search), a non (Expand Search), i non (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e non » _ non (Expand Search), a non (Expand Search), i non (Expand Search)
-
381
-
382
The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size.
Published 2022“…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
-
383
-
384
-
385
-
386
mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents.
Published 2019“…<p>(<b>A–B</b>) Bath perfusion of DHPG for 3 min reduced GlyR-IPSCs (<b>A</b>; 70.2 ± 4.2% of baseline at 15–20 min post-DHPG, <i>t</i>[16] = 6.707, <i>p</i> < 0.001, paired Student <i>t</i> test), but not GABA<sub>A</sub>-receptor–mediated IPSCs (<b>B</b>; 102.9 ± 3.3% of baseline at 15–20 min post-DHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.347, <i>p</i> = 0.743) in spinal slices of mice. …”
-
387
-
388
-
389
-
390
-
391
-
392
-
393
-
394
-
395
-
396
-
397
-
398
Density plots of normalised consumer final power (PC) for the six example networks, shown over decreasing ratios of mean consumer to mean resource potential, .
Published 2020“…<p>Each plot shows the density for the normalised consumer final power at = 0.75, 0.5, and 0.25, from left to right, as the ratio decreases due to increased resource flow during the simulation. …”
-
399
-
400